Buff, casi me he perdido. Lo que quería decir es lo que se deduce de aquí:
Not everybody likes the *BSD ports tree or the *BSD userland (this is a personal preference thing, rather than any sort of comment on quality). Linux distributions have been produced which provide *BSD style ports or a *BSD style userland for those who like the BSD user environment but also wish to use the Linux kernel - Debian GNU/NetBSD is the logical reverse of this, allowing people who like the GNU userland or a Linux-style packaging system to use the NetBSD kernel.
Es decir, que GNU se considera(lo consideran ellos) una familia de sistemas Operativos. Lo que decía de SystemV es que esa "familia Gnu", supongo que está dentro de SystemV. En fin, la verdad es que me pierdo....
--
Programs should be written for people to read,
and only incidentally for machines to execute
¿Estamos de acuerdo?
(Puntos:2)( Última bitácora: Lunes, 22 Febrero de 2016, 07:16h )
Not everybody likes the *BSD ports tree or the *BSD userland (this is a personal preference thing, rather than any sort of comment on quality). Linux distributions have been produced which provide *BSD style ports or a *BSD style userland for those who like the BSD user environment but also wish to use the Linux kernel - Debian GNU/NetBSD is the logical reverse of this, allowing people who like the GNU userland or a Linux-style packaging system to use the NetBSD kernel.
Es decir, que GNU se considera(lo consideran ellos) una familia de sistemas Operativos. Lo que decía de SystemV es que esa "familia Gnu", supongo que está dentro de SystemV. En fin, la verdad es que me pierdo....
Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute